Moderators: alvin, learner, Dennis Ng
robinhan wrote:Sheng siong(buy when price reach 0.465, sell to stop loss at 0.45)formed an uptrend in the past 1 and a half month. Recently, it dropped to the support trendline already. We can see that the pull back ratio is 50%, a very nice figure for consolidation. And we can also see that the volume of pull back is quite low. If it go higher than Friday high, it is likely to continue it’s uptrend and give an opportunity to long.
Dennis Ng wrote:Imagine if in Jan 2011 you read this posting of mine in "Discussion Specific Stocks" Discussion Thread (ONLY open to my Seminar Graduates)...
Let me ask you:
Would it have helped you avoid losing Money on Capitaland?
Would it have helped you avoid Buying Capitaland?
Capitaland dropped below S$3.80 and on 17 Jun 2011, closed at S$2.75, or down 27.6%...
Increasing Investment Knowledge can indeed help you to Increase Your Wealth and Avoid Losing Money. This is another Real Life Example.
Stop buying/selling stocks blindly, listening to Stock Tips and Rumours. Learn how to "fish" (Invest) from me and start making money and avoid losing more money.
What seminar am I conducting this weekend? It's "Secrets to Making Money in Stocks Seminar". I'm looking forward to teaching another full house audience "How to Fish" (Invest)...it's sheer joy and fulfillment to see students coming to my Seminar with Zero Knowledge in Stock Investing and graduating with their Eyes Opened and confident in knowing What Stocks to Invest, When to Buy and When to Sell Stocks.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JjLmWYskr0
Cheers!
Dennis NgDennis Ng wrote:
27 Jan 2011:
Looking at Capitaland 2 years' price/volume chart, S$3.80 is the major Support price, once break below S$3.80....no strong support price detected above S$3....all below S$3....
Note: it does not necessary mean that the price will drop below S$3 though....just looking at Price/Volume historical charts...
racoon12 wrote:So....the rich get richer ... refinance let other pay for his assest
Why does billionaire Mark Zuckerberg need a loan? Jul 18, 2012
By Romesh Navaratnarajah:
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg (pictured) recently refinanced his Palo Alto home near the company’s headquarters with a 30-year 1.05 percent adjustable mortgage rate.
This has left many wondering why a billionaire such as himself, valued at around $15.6 billion (S$19.67 billion), would take out a loan for a US$5.95 million (S$7.5 million) house when he can buy it outright.
According to analysts, this is because US mortgage rates are at historical lows and Zuckerberg’s loan costs absolutely nothing.
“When you borrow at an interest rate that’s below the rate of inflation, you’re essentially borrowing for free,” said Greg McBride, Senior Analyst at mortgage tracker Bankrate.com.
“When you can borrow for free, there’s no sense in tying up your own money, when you can use that money for more profitable things,” he added.
Zuckerberg’s low rate is due to the fact that his mortgage is adjustable, so the interest rate could go up. While these types of loans usually have lower interest, they are reserved for borrowers with zero risk.
“This is not a product reserved for celebrities,” McBride said. “They aren’t necessarily billionaires. We’re talking about people who are millionaires, at least – corporate executives, wealthy people.”
Dennis Ng wrote:yes, now people are fijnally awakened. Why Facebook founder, the youngest Billionaire (valued US$15.6 billion) need to borrow a loan for his house for only US$5.95 million?
yes, as I mentioned I learned from multi-millionaire sifus that the Rich always try to use Other People Money instead of their own money, this is called Leverage ie. minimise input, maximise Output (returns). Thus, the Rich do NOT aim to be debt-free unlike the average middle class. ALL the Rich borrow, many examples eg. Genting Singapore now borrow S$2 billion and pay 5.125% interest just to be standby money for possible Opportunities...shareholders of Genting Singapore even questioned why the management is doing such a silly thing....and Mr Lim (the boss) have to tell the shareholder that you need to borrow the money before you need it, becos by the time you need it, it is too late to borrow and the Opportunity may already be gone.
Many seminar attendees before they attend my seminars, many hold the Middle Class Thinking "to be debt free as soon as possible", "do NOT borrow if I have cash myself" or pay double the insurance premiums and only get half the coverage or "insurance plan is a good form of saving" or Bank Deposit is safest (truth it is most dangerous becos guaranteed to lose money as interest less than inflation)...some got a Big shock and feeling of Enlightenment (in financial matters) after they attend my seminars, but I know there are some seminar graduates who are NOT confident or doubtful about some of the things I taught (I can only say this is their Loss, not mine, since I did teach everything I know that WORKS).
Thus, truly if you attend my seminars, you will get to Learn How the Rich Think (mindset of the Rich), what the Rich do (borrow Good Debt avoid Bad Debt to become Richer and Richer), How the Rich invest into Stocks, How the Rich invest into property...what I taught in the seminars alot of it is NOT available in ANY books outside other than some portion from the 3 books I wrote myself.
Thus, as I said, what I teach in my 3 seminars is the ONLY Comprehensive Financial Education Seminars in Singapore, which cover Overall Financial Planning (How to Save and Accumulate One Million Dollars Seminar), how to invest in stocks (Secrets to Making Money in Stocks Seminar) an how to buy for home stay and how to invest in property (Secrets to Making Money in Property)...and now with the launch of Secrets to Making Money in Business, we will really cover the 3 main ways How people get Rich. If you go through the Richest 40 people in Singapore, you would realise their source of Wealth comes from making money from stocks, property and/or business.
And in order to make sure more people can attend our seminars, our seminars are Priced at the Lowest Price compared to other seminars in the market (this is something that anyone can easily verify). A typical stock seminar is S$3,000, a typical Property seminar is S$3,000 or more, a typical Business Seminar is S$3,000. So one needs to pay about S$10,000 to attend 3 seminars out there. But they can attend ALL 4 of our seminars at a Special Price of only S$4,096 or 60% DISCOUNT!
Furthermore, we have this forum where seminar graduates can ask questions daily after attending the seminar. We have Monthly Investing Mentor Sharing session and the Quarterly Seminar Graduates' Gathering/Seminar - which are currently ALL complimentary to seminar graduates and we bear all the costs ourselves which run into easily a few thousand dollars just to rent a auditorium alone. And a tea break typically can be S$6 per pax. (x 500 = S$3,000).
Why are we charging the Lowest Price and yet provide FREE continuing follow up and education/guidance to the public?
Becos my main objective is to educate the public, not to make money. Some seminar speakers even sell properties to their graduates, and you know 1% commission on a property can be already S$10,000 (for a S$1 million property). I know it is very lucrative but I do NOT sell any properties in my seminar, becos my Main Aim is to educate, not to make money.
The funny thing is there remains 1,000 seminar graduates who did NOT even register themselves in this Forum. Thus, I think this happen becos the forum is offered FREE to them. Thus, I am likely to going to introduce a Paid Forum Membership in future, becos as I said, when it is FREE, problem is people do NOT see or appreciate the Value, if it is Paid, then I bet the Forum will be 10 times more active with more participation from seminar graduates. So this is going to happen soon. Why am I doing it? I already provided the reason becos people don't value things that are FREE.
Cheers!
Dennis Ngracoon12 wrote:So....the rich get richer ... refinance let other pay for his assest
Why does billionaire Mark Zuckerberg need a loan? Jul 18, 2012
By Romesh Navaratnarajah:
Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg (pictured) recently refinanced his Palo Alto home near the company’s headquarters with a 30-year 1.05 percent adjustable mortgage rate.
This has left many wondering why a billionaire such as himself, valued at around $15.6 billion (S$19.67 billion), would take out a loan for a US$5.95 million (S$7.5 million) house when he can buy it outright.
According to analysts, this is because US mortgage rates are at historical lows and Zuckerberg’s loan costs absolutely nothing.
“When you borrow at an interest rate that’s below the rate of inflation, you’re essentially borrowing for free,” said Greg McBride, Senior Analyst at mortgage tracker Bankrate.com.
“When you can borrow for free, there’s no sense in tying up your own money, when you can use that money for more profitable things,” he added.
Zuckerberg’s low rate is due to the fact that his mortgage is adjustable, so the interest rate could go up. While these types of loans usually have lower interest, they are reserved for borrowers with zero risk.
“This is not a product reserved for celebrities,” McBride said. “They aren’t necessarily billionaires. We’re talking about people who are millionaires, at least – corporate executives, wealthy people.”
Dennis Ng wrote:Hyflux, once a darling by many analysts, who issued research reports saying it is a Buy. Once, Hyflux was above S$3.
Hope ailing sold her Hyflux shares at S$1.60 then. Today, the share price fell to S$1.405 and it recently announced huge cost overrun of S$160 million of its Tuaspring project. The cost overrun has material financial impact on its current year..
Increasing Investment Knowledge can indeed help you to reduce losses and increase gains.
Cheers!
Dennis Ngailing wrote:Hi Dennis,
I checked and found that I sold off Hyflux in Aug 2011 at $1.685 then, incurred some losses.
Dennis Ng wrote:31 Mar 2011
NextInsight.net was one of the websites that issued Buy call for "China Hong Xing" before it got suspended. (NextInsight is set up by Leong Chan Teik (former Editor of Invest section of Sunday Times) set up in mid-2007 (what a Bad Timing, just before Stock Market Crash) together with Leong Chan Teik, a former Straits Times senior correspondent, and Kathy Zhang, founder and MD of Financial PR, (which helps companies list in Singapore, mainly China companies).
Chan Teik was a journalist for 18 years with The Straits Times, where he won several in-house awards for excellence. He also received the SIAS Financial Journalist of the Year 2002 accolade. (SIAS stands for Securities Investors Association of Singapore).
After his departure, Lorna Tan took over as Editor of Invest Section of Sunday Times from then till today.
I've been interviewed by Leong Chan Teik on several occasions and even met up with him to talk about investing. He appears to be a strict 100% Value Investor who does NOT believe in using Technical Analysis to help to decide when to Buy and Sell stocks. He's like Warren Buffett, prefers to buy and hold stocks forever...(actually Warren Buffett do sell stocks, despite what he said, for example, in year 2007, he sold all his holdings of PetroChina before China Stock Market crashed...so people might be just listening to Warren Buffett blindly without observing what he DOES (Action Speaks Louder than Words).
I personally think it is silly to buy and hold forever, which is akin to riding a Roller Coaster up and down, not knowing when to get down. (Sell).
I'm a Market Cycle Investor, preferring to hold a stock to ride the uptrend and sell High and get out to avoid Market Crash...then I repeat the process, after Market Crash, Buy Low and ride the next uptrend in Markets, that's how I made my first Million in year 2008.
NextInsight’s senior writer and photographer is Sim Kih, who was an investor relations consultant for several years after working in equity sales at OSK-DMG & Partners. She has cleared all her Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) examinations.
Before that, Kathy Zhang of Financial PR set up WallStraits.com with Curtis Montgomery in year 1999.
Curtis uses a 8 step analysis process to analyse companies. In the end, many of the companies he analysed as Good Buys turned out differently and anyone investing in those companies would have lost alot of money, including stocks such as United Food and Sunray. Curtis disappeared from internet forum in year 2007 before WallStraits.com was discontinued...
Curtis wrote a few books, including "Sun Tzu On Investing". I even helped organised a few seminar for Curtis and exchanged knowledge and ideas with him, but in the end, I realised that what he uses to analyse may not make sense as he Project profits and cashflows for 10 years (similar to formulas calculating Intrinsic Value)....which resulting in him having overly Optimistic View of some stocks...
So even Authors of Stock Investing books might NOT get it Right themselves...he also does NOT consider Technical Analysis and the Presence of Invisible Hands, things which I learned from other Real Life Multi-milionaires which I found to work very well in Investing into Singapore Stock Market...and of course, the rest is history, I made my First Million in year 2008.
one of the books written by Curtis Montgomery:
http://www.amazon.com/Sun-Tzu-Investing ... 0470821078
8 business screens of the WallStraits devised by Curtis Montgomery :
1. Consistent historical sales and earnings growth
2. Conservative Financing with total debt less than a single year's net earnings
3. Consistently high return-on-equity (ROE), > 15% each year
4. Intelligent Capital Allocation Decisions
5. Business is easy to understand, and Management is open and honest
6. 2x5y: Industry sector supports doubling of sales and earnings
7. Sustainable Competitive Addvantages are evident
8. Attractive Valuation based on Discounted Cash Flow projections
Return to Financial Principles
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests